Monday, 27 December 2010
IPTV is dead - long live broadcast
Some initiatives have the seeds of commercial viability, others you know are much shakier. Almost none of these new services are commissioning content. Those that are, are not exactly mainstream and usually rely on a enthusiast and volunteers. Other “unique” or “original” content is UGC. So the vast majority of commercially viable services are reliant on content that has been created for and funded for, by more traditional platform such as cinema DVD/BD and TV broadcast. Therefore they are relying on the, much talked about, “long tail” value of content, or at best trying to extract just a little more value out of content at some stage in its life cycle.
The first thing against IPTV is, Internet/PC is not the place to watch quality content if you want to see it first. It will have been on another platform first. That is where the premium revenues will come from.
The second thing against IPTV is the picture quality is lagging behind other delivery mechanisms. 2Mb/s is arguably just about sufficient for a SD TV picture, 5 Mb/s is DVD quality and a 1080p HD feed that matches Blu-ray quality is 40Mb/s.
So here I am (as a consumer) with my nice large (and expensive) 1080p screen watching HD cable, DTH or DTV channel. For the latest films I have the choice of the cinema or the rental and purchase of a Blu-ray. Why am going to watch IPTV? Even if it doesn’t keep buffering, I am unlikely to get anything close to the same picture quality without downloading to some storage devices in my house. Wait a minute isn't that a DVR? Oh no it yet another box I've got to but and wire in and balance on the stack of Set Top Boxes.
I will sacrifice picture quality for something I may have missed. Better to see it in a poorer quality than not at all. Services such as iPlayer are undoubtedly a new facet to the growing arsenal of my TV entertainment options, alongside DVR’s, and games consuls.
I may also sacrifice picture quality to see something unique, niche or exclusive but this is unlikely to be the way that most people consume most TV content most of the time. Even if broadband bandwidths are larger and all you can eat, there is a large number of things that have to come together to make it work for the consumer.
Virgin and Sky, providing pay TV services with multiple channels, are also providing broadband. Virgin in particular provides some of the highest broadband connection speeds available in the UK at the moment. As bandwidth increases their users could opt to drop the pay TV bouquet for OTT IPTV. As Virgin and Sky provide larger broadband they could be undermining their own business. Are the stupid? No. They know that whatever you get via IPTV that is free will be old (to at least some degree), will be inferior or a niche that they do not service anyway.
The big success of IPTV in the UK is the BBC iPlayer. There also exists the ITV player and 4oD. All three share the same fact that they are free to the consumer. Most (if not all) content consumption to date has been to a computer of some sort. Presumably this tech savvy audience knows how to access all three yet the iPlayer is by far the largest of all the IPTV options in the UK put together (with the exception of YouTube).
If we assume that the content is comparable, then why the disparity in take up? The most obvious difference is the lack of adverts on iPlayer. The second difference is the range of content across the four BBC TV channels and the umpteen BBC Radio channels. This makes the iPlayer a comfortable and resourceful destination for content. Watching iPlayer is like watching a DVR, watching ITV player and 4oD is not, as I can’t skip the ads. I also have only the content of one channel to select from. (ITV and Channel 4 do not offer a variety from their main output).
IPTV is a cleaver technology but just because you can do something doesn’t mean you will. The real challenge is to deliver something the customer wants, something they may not yet know they want, but like so many people that have a DVR will tell you “I wouldn’t do without it now”. The thing to note is that the mass adoption of DVR's hasn't really happened yet. Most people have them as part of their DTH or Cable package. But Freeview/Freesat customers have not taken to them on mass yet. The industry is looking for the next revolution when this one hasn't happened yet.
Saturday, 31 July 2010
High Voltage 2010 - Day 2
Day 1 had taken its toll. My feet ached from the previous day I’d left home at 10:00 I arrived home at 1 am on the Sunday, 15 hours, most of which I had spent standing and drinking and of course listening to some fantastic rock music.
When the alarm went off on Sunday morning I discovered that; I had blisters on my feet, the back of my legs were sunburn, I a ringing in my ears and a slight hangover as well as being 48 quid lighter (that works out at about a pint an hour which wasn’t bad as I was travelling for at least three of those hours).
Day 2 required that I abandon my trainers and put some proper boots and socks on as well as sun barrier on my legs.
I wasn’t quite so eager to get out of the house so arrived to hear the last 30 seconds of “The Reasoning”. Before making my way across (via a beer tent) to “The Qureboys”. I think some of the band had been drinking, but a great opening to my day two.

I broke with tradition and went to look for some food. On a side note the larger on site was crap, so mostly drank the cider. The food... there was a lot of choice. Some was a rip off and other was OK value wise. You could tell the best value as food as they had the longest queues
Anyway some food and a second pint I was ready for some "UFO". Now they did have some problems with the sound of one of their guitars again ... and again... and again. I think the sound man should have been shot as he appeared to give up. However "UFO" played on. I could imagine other bands storming off, but not "UFO".

Bachman Turner... I have to admit I lost interest and wondered off to the Metal stage via the Prog stage

Clutch is a band that my son introduced me to and I have to say “Thanks Dan! You owed my for introducing you to Led Zeppelin” I think “Clutch” play some inspirational music. I’d seen them once before live and was not going to miss another opportunity. They didn’t disappoint.

I got into early Led Zeppelin some time ago and that lead to bit of obsession with the blues. During this time I discovered Joe Bonamassa. Technically brilliant but pretty much the same intricate guitar solos one after the other. The medley of guitar riffs was a high light, but Joe needs a band around him to add some colour to his repertoire .

“The Down n’ Outz”, I’d seen these at the Borderline a couple of days earlier. I think it’s commonly known as a warm up. I think the band were there for the same reason! There was some f#@king around at the start and waiting for Ian Hunter to come out. This cut their set short and the crowd were deprived of some sing-a-long stuff they had finished with at the Borderline Alas they finished on a low as they were cut off to prevent an overrun that would have eaten into ELP’s allotted time.

Finally “ELP” – by this time the 55 to 65 year olds were flagging. At one time the audience resembled hungry starlings as they simultaneously yawned while the “ELP” rig was going on. Several gave up and left as sleep become more inviting than “ELP”. But they should have stayed as ELP did not disappoint. Fantastic way to finish off the festival. Hats off to Palmer, we worked so hard, Emerson hasn’t lost the ability to tickle those keys nut the knife thing is old hat find something new. Lake voice sounded OK actually the sound was the best it had been for the whole show. But Lake... leave the pies alone!

Some tips for next year – obviously the music needs to be at least as good. But recognise your audience has a high percentage of old gits that like real ale. Their Mrs will probably drink wine. The food needs to have a Marks Simply Food style option.
Some more seating! We are relatively rich, but we are old! Deck chair hire, or am I just taking the piss?
Put the headline act on as the penultimate band. Finish off with a tribute band to play the crowd on their way home. I know that is crap idea but the odd (but excellent) tribute band would go down extremely well.
Monday, 26 July 2010
High Voltage 2010











Thursday, 3 June 2010
Saturday, 23 January 2010
DataTool S4 Special Features
So why don’t manufacturers, of various goods, stop at the warning label? Why do the insist on trying to making it impossible for the few competent people on this planet to do things?
This alarm is a case in point. There are a set of features that are not accessible to the owner but require “dealer” intervention. These features include altering the sensitivity to movement. So if someone tries to put it in a van or even take it off the stand it will alarm. Obviously in an exposed windy site you may need to wind down the wick a bit. Permanently, because you live on the top of Dartmoor, or temporarily, because you are camping there for a couple of days. The nudge sensor plus several others are likewise is on this list requiring “dealer access”.
My experience of bikers (in general) is that the ones that survive beyond their teenage years fall into two broad categories. Simple folk that are just artists at bike riding and realists with a survival instinct and quick reflexes. All have a degree of practical aptitude to know at least the basics of how their machine works.
This of course maybe my age and the younger generation may prove to be something else.
The instructions are written by someone with an MBA and no common sense. I’ve tried t simplify them in this flow chart. Constructive feedback welcomed.
Anyway for all you practical motorcyclists, here is how you access and configure the DataTool S4 Alarm’s “Special Features”
Wednesday, 2 December 2009
BSkyB and Carphone to fight proposal on BT pension fund
I have some sympathy that BT has made some crap decisions on investment, products to support and technologies to ditch.
Investing in technologies and selling them off just on the cusp of them generating revenue and returning the investment. Selling off large revenue low margin business because no one wants to take it by the balls and strip out the costs. Idiots!
It is that mismanagement that the inability to distinguish talent from style to ignore detail and the people that manage because it is boring and not as entertaining as the “high level” PowerPoint slides.
Having worked for BT for 38 years, in April they decided to change the pension scheme. This is a formal contract changed unilaterally by one party. Yet my divorce (last post) was only 30 years but I am not allowed to change (what I perceive) as a far woollier contract of marriage.
BT can’t afford it – they are not really that interested in it – when privatised ever member of the board was in the BT pension scheme – today not one. “I’m all right jack” I’ve negotiated a separate pension package which is far more beneficial than yours.
Life is not fair, and then you die!
Getting Divorce - claim on future income
We have gradually grown apart over the years not least when the kids where young and I worked 7 days a week both overtime and moonlighting. My wife didn’t go to work but provided the family home and stability something we both wanted and thought important.
Eventually we got comfortable for money, when the kids were about 11 and my wife had got a part time job. I dropped to 5 working days and got stuck into the DIY. I then started to go to night school for several management courses eventually obtaining an MBA. During this period I was studying, a largely solo task.
My wife mean time had taken the kids out for days and to swimming lessons, piano lessons etc. We didn’t have much of a social life often both falling asleep in front of the telly at night.
My MBA got me several rounds of promotion and my working world was different changing me and my outlook. The time with the kids had changed my wife. Later she discovered that her dead mother had been married before and had three boys and a girl that had been in orphanages. This shattered her view of her mother and there was no one to rebuild it. She grew closer to them. I suspect as a result of a bit of guilt that she had a fairly privileged life while her half brothers and sister had been split among several orphanages with varying experiences.
In the nearly five years since she found her other family we have grown remote from each other even though we live in the same house. She has grown extravagant and as I earn most of the money working full time while she was only working part time I decided to separate our finances. At which point she asked for a divorce and I jumped at it.
I discover from my solicitor that everything that we have accumulated – including my salary and pension forms part of the “marriage assets” and that it all has to be split 50:50. I have no problem with splitting the assets like house, car and savings 50:50 but on my future income I find it too much to accept.
My logic is I’m 54 and have been married for 30 and unmarried for 24. The sum of who and what I am, is not just the past 30 years. Some might argue that the first 24 years where more formative.
Looking at it this way my wife has contributed to who and what I am for 56% of my life and splitting that 50:50 would give 18% call on my income, assuming she earned nothing.