Saturday, 23 January 2010

DataTool S4 Special Features

I have a DATATOOL S4 immobiliser/alarm fitted to my motorbike. One of my pet hates is… if I’ve bought something it is my absolute right to play with it. If I cock it up and have to throw it away, or pay someone to repair it, that is my problem.

So why don’t manufacturers, of various goods, stop at the warning label? Why do the insist on trying to making it impossible for the few competent people on this planet to do things?

This alarm is a case in point. There are a set of features that are not accessible to the owner but require “dealer” intervention. These features include altering the sensitivity to movement. So if someone tries to put it in a van or even take it off the stand it will alarm. Obviously in an exposed windy site you may need to wind down the wick a bit. Permanently, because you live on the top of Dartmoor, or temporarily, because you are camping there for a couple of days. The nudge sensor plus several others are likewise is on this list requiring “dealer access”.

My experience of bikers (in general) is that the ones that survive beyond their teenage years fall into two broad categories. Simple folk that are just artists at bike riding and realists with a survival instinct and quick reflexes. All have a degree of practical aptitude to know at least the basics of how their machine works.

This of course maybe my age and the younger generation may prove to be something else.

The instructions are written by someone with an MBA and no common sense. I’ve tried t simplify them in this flow chart. Constructive feedback welcomed.

Anyway for all you practical motorcyclists, here is how you access and configure the DataTool S4 Alarm’s “Special Features”

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

BSkyB and Carphone to fight proposal on BT pension fund

Unsurprisingly BSkyB and Carphone Warehouse don’t want to pay to fill BT’s pension hole. The reality is that they only know what BT is going to spend the money on because BT is heavily regulated. Carphone’s customer do not get the luxury of not paying for their purchase of Tiscali or for their development of an on demand TV service. The move to new headquarters or the CEO’s bonus.

I have some sympathy that BT has made some crap decisions on investment, products to support and technologies to ditch.

Investing in technologies and selling them off just on the cusp of them generating revenue and returning the investment. Selling off large revenue low margin business because no one wants to take it by the balls and strip out the costs. Idiots!

It is that mismanagement that the inability to distinguish talent from style to ignore detail and the people that manage because it is boring and not as entertaining as the “high level” PowerPoint slides.

Having worked for BT for 38 years, in April they decided to change the pension scheme. This is a formal contract changed unilaterally by one party. Yet my divorce (last post) was only 30 years but I am not allowed to change (what I perceive) as a far woollier contract of marriage.

BT can’t afford it – they are not really that interested in it – when privatised ever member of the board was in the BT pension scheme – today not one. “I’m all right jack” I’ve negotiated a separate pension package which is far more beneficial than yours.

Life is not fair, and then you die!

Getting Divorce - claim on future income

I’m starting to go through a divorce after 30-years of marriage. As far as I know there is no one else involved, certainly not from my part?

We have gradually grown apart over the years not least when the kids where young and I worked 7 days a week both overtime and moonlighting. My wife didn’t go to work but provided the family home and stability something we both wanted and thought important.

Eventually we got comfortable for money, when the kids were about 11 and my wife had got a part time job. I dropped to 5 working days and got stuck into the DIY. I then started to go to night school for several management courses eventually obtaining an MBA. During this period I was studying, a largely solo task.

My wife mean time had taken the kids out for days and to swimming lessons, piano lessons etc. We didn’t have much of a social life often both falling asleep in front of the telly at night.

My MBA got me several rounds of promotion and my working world was different changing me and my outlook. The time with the kids had changed my wife. Later she discovered that her dead mother had been married before and had three boys and a girl that had been in orphanages. This shattered her view of her mother and there was no one to rebuild it. She grew closer to them. I suspect as a result of a bit of guilt that she had a fairly privileged life while her half brothers and sister had been split among several orphanages with varying experiences.

In the nearly five years since she found her other family we have grown remote from each other even though we live in the same house. She has grown extravagant and as I earn most of the money working full time while she was only working part time I decided to separate our finances. At which point she asked for a divorce and I jumped at it.

I discover from my solicitor that everything that we have accumulated – including my salary and pension forms part of the “marriage assets” and that it all has to be split 50:50. I have no problem with splitting the assets like house, car and savings 50:50 but on my future income I find it too much to accept.

My logic is I’m 54 and have been married for 30 and unmarried for 24. The sum of who and what I am, is not just the past 30 years. Some might argue that the first 24 years where more formative.

Looking at it this way my wife has contributed to who and what I am for 56% of my life and splitting that 50:50 would give 18% call on my income, assuming she earned nothing.

Friday, 6 November 2009

Professor David Nutt

Independent scientific advice – but if it doesn’t fit with what we like we ignore it

I do not have a problem with that, but if this changes the law, where people go to jail and get criminal records, surly as an accountable, democratic government, you MUST explain why?

If the “independent” scientific advisor talks about their advice in public and gets sacked: -

a) In what way are they independent?
b) Discourages open honest debate.
c) Discredits the government’s decision making process.
d) Discredits other “independent” advice as simply rubber stamping the political decision.

Grow up and move away from being the playground bully. If the advice is wrong or it needs to be ignored for some ideology, state the case. Stand or fall by the decision but don’t shoot the messenger.

Saturday, 31 October 2009

Pilot that car!

Driving has become such an everyday occurrence that we (drivers and passengers) have all become complacent. But some are more complacent then others. Some think they are sitting in front of their telly at home. They do all the same things; eat, drink, smoke, answer the phone, change channels, change the CD, turn and talk to passenger, shout at the kids, and day dream. If we found the pilot of an aircraft doing any of these we would want them sacked. Yet the aircraft has many features that prevent the pilot making mistakes, there is a strict pre-flight check list to run through and there is a co-pilot.

So complacent have some people got that they think their car is an arm chair, they never check the tyres or tyre pressure, they never look under the bonnet and check the oil, they treat it at best the same as their washing machine, switch it on and it works until it doesn’t. At worst they treat it like their arm chair, where they can fall asleep without any danger.

I believe that to drive should be a natural progression from pedal cycle, to motorcycle, to car and I some experience of HGV or PSV.

Why can cyclists drive without any proven knowledge of road craft? Why do they not need to have passed a test, obtained insurance? They can easily attain speeds above urban limits and cause extensive both physical and property damage, even death. These “green” people with their responsibility to the “earth” lack any responsibility to their fellow road users.

Motorcycling, a way to travel moderate distances cost effectively. Often the first vehicle of the young, as it’s cheaper than a car. New to driving they ride beyond the capabilities of themselves, their machines and the road conditions. At least if they had to have a cycle licence for a year they would have some experience. As well as an appreciation for the lot that is the cyclist.

Sitting in your car, even if you have done come cycling and motorcycling, it’s easy to forget how cold it is in the winter, how unstable the road or weather conditions can make travelling on these vehicles, but you at least have some memory over those that have never done it.

Van, coach and bus drivers that stop to let cars turn right across them, think they are doing a good turn, being knights of the road. But seem unable to open their window and hand signal a passing cyclist or motorcyclist of the impending roadblock that is about to appear in front of them.

Driving an HGV and or a PSV is surely the only way to appreciate what rear and side visibility restrictions. Even if this was an off road “experience” type training it has to be a plus in road safety.
Testing at various stages and compulsory stages will make it more expensive for the driver. But will increase sales of pushbikes motorbikes, create employment not only in manufacture but in training and testing, reduce road accidents.

More people die on the roads every day, on average, than die in air accidents in a year. So why are politicians afraid of doing something about it?

Friday, 30 October 2009

Is internet piracy is problem that cannot be ignored?

The music industry claims they have lost £200m in the UK. The UK Government’s proposal to make the ISP police their users will cost £365m. OK so not all piracy is music. How do they calculate the £200m? Well they assume that every download is a lost sale. Not true as much is down loaded just to try and deleted. If it is all downloaded and kept – how often is it played? People that accumulated vast libraries would need to burn hundreds of DVD or purchase massive hard drives. Down loading files takes time and file away catalogue etc. Now with Spotify and other services you can try most music for free. You can play it any time and as often as you like and managing the library is someone else’s problem. Where music has gone maybe TV and films will follow.

Making ISP’s responsible is like asking them to become a form of censor on your activities. Why not making the council responsible for preventing muggers using the streets? Or make public transport responsible for shoplifters getting to the shops?

Wednesday, 28 October 2009

Murdoch doesn’t dominate the media

I wonder what it’s like to live in a country where Murdoch doesn’t dominate the media. On the downside you have a questionable Prime Minister in control – I use the term “control” loosely.

Oct 26, 2009 Mediaset (BIT:MS), the commercial broadcaster controlled by Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, said Monday a Milan court had rejected claims by Rupert Murdoch's satellite unit Sky Italia accusing Mediaset of not letting it buy advertising time on its free-to-air channels. A request to order Mediaset to immediately resume providing advertisement time to Sky Italia has been dismissed, Berlusconi's company said in a statement. The request to ban Mediaset from broadcasting spots for its pay-TV offer Mediaset Premium on its channels has also been rejected, Mediaset said.

In 2009 alone, 3,107 Sky spots were hosted on Mediaset's channels, the Berlusconi company added.

Sky Italia, part of News Corp (NASDAQ:NWS), had filed a lawsuit against Mediaset units RTI and Publitalia.